Did you know that if an exposure to a full sun for only 15 minutes which is 350,000,000 terawatts of power would be enough to generate the worlds energy requirement period.
When comparing that with energy that is generated by nuclear and fossil fuel. Presently, the available data for fossil and nuclear fuel is 10,800,000 terawatts which we all know to be non renewable.
To produce electricity, utility companies burn fossil fuels that translate to 1.3 pounds of carbon dioxide to produce 1kw of electrical power. This unwanted CO2 emissions are unfortunately dumped into the atmosphere. This then translates into each typical home being accountable yearly for 22,000 pounds of CO2 emissions.
So why aren't more people using solar power for domestic use and harnessing the suns rays for clean and safe energy. Solar power produces no emissions and it is practical and may in the years ahead, prove very economical. In the United States, only 0.1% of power that is generated is solar energy driven. So what are the obstacles?
According to the Wall Street Journal (in an article that was released in its August 2009 issue), there are groups, backed by political groups that are lobbying against the putting up of transmission lines for solar power. The construction of distribution lines for solar energy is also being blocked by environmental activists that restrict the delivering of solar energy to those who want it in their homes.
Another obstacle is that the power grid in the United States which was designed more than 100 years ago is now so congested in many regions. To deliver the solar power for domestic use to consumers, scientists and engineers will have to come out with another cost efficient plan to transfer huge amounts of energy from one location to another.
Solar panels are considered expensive. Although a home increases its value by folds when solar powered, the costs still could be prohibitive to most that unless the non silicon flexible solar panels that are now being developed are released for market consumption, powering homes through solar energy could still be very limited.
Other forms of rewards to avoid fossil fuel use should still be effectively placed. The 30% tax cut to projected cost previously awarded will be more attractive if other federal credits are included to encourage further investments.
The global warming issue that has been brought to the papers is a recurrent subject of talk shows and remains to be a good news item. Also, the too unstable pump prices, should and for most part, already be a good incentive to use this alternative source of energy.
However, effective solar energy transmission to homes will remain to be very hard unless these obstacles are breached. Assuming that these obstacles are solved today, it will still take some 10 years to convert 20% of American homes into solar energy users. Meanwhile, solar panels on individual homes remain to be the most viable alternative.
The good part to solar power for domestic use is that technology is advancing very rapidly.Better technology for solar power is being developed and is be available now. Other breakthroughs in cell designs are also being developed as we speak, in the next few years, there will be cost-effective ways of generating energy without having to rely anymore on fossil and nuclear power.
There are ways right now to build from the comforts of home, solar panels for around $100 a panel which can and will solve all your home and heating energy needs now and well into the future.
When comparing that with energy that is generated by nuclear and fossil fuel. Presently, the available data for fossil and nuclear fuel is 10,800,000 terawatts which we all know to be non renewable.
To produce electricity, utility companies burn fossil fuels that translate to 1.3 pounds of carbon dioxide to produce 1kw of electrical power. This unwanted CO2 emissions are unfortunately dumped into the atmosphere. This then translates into each typical home being accountable yearly for 22,000 pounds of CO2 emissions.
So why aren't more people using solar power for domestic use and harnessing the suns rays for clean and safe energy. Solar power produces no emissions and it is practical and may in the years ahead, prove very economical. In the United States, only 0.1% of power that is generated is solar energy driven. So what are the obstacles?
According to the Wall Street Journal (in an article that was released in its August 2009 issue), there are groups, backed by political groups that are lobbying against the putting up of transmission lines for solar power. The construction of distribution lines for solar energy is also being blocked by environmental activists that restrict the delivering of solar energy to those who want it in their homes.
Another obstacle is that the power grid in the United States which was designed more than 100 years ago is now so congested in many regions. To deliver the solar power for domestic use to consumers, scientists and engineers will have to come out with another cost efficient plan to transfer huge amounts of energy from one location to another.
Solar panels are considered expensive. Although a home increases its value by folds when solar powered, the costs still could be prohibitive to most that unless the non silicon flexible solar panels that are now being developed are released for market consumption, powering homes through solar energy could still be very limited.
Other forms of rewards to avoid fossil fuel use should still be effectively placed. The 30% tax cut to projected cost previously awarded will be more attractive if other federal credits are included to encourage further investments.
The global warming issue that has been brought to the papers is a recurrent subject of talk shows and remains to be a good news item. Also, the too unstable pump prices, should and for most part, already be a good incentive to use this alternative source of energy.
However, effective solar energy transmission to homes will remain to be very hard unless these obstacles are breached. Assuming that these obstacles are solved today, it will still take some 10 years to convert 20% of American homes into solar energy users. Meanwhile, solar panels on individual homes remain to be the most viable alternative.
The good part to solar power for domestic use is that technology is advancing very rapidly.Better technology for solar power is being developed and is be available now. Other breakthroughs in cell designs are also being developed as we speak, in the next few years, there will be cost-effective ways of generating energy without having to rely anymore on fossil and nuclear power.
There are ways right now to build from the comforts of home, solar panels for around $100 a panel which can and will solve all your home and heating energy needs now and well into the future.
As you can see Solar Power For Domestic Use [http://solarpowerfordomesticuse.com] right now is getting more and more popular with home owners...
Not only for saving energy costs but doing there part to save the planet, if you need more information on solar
products and plans to go solar click this link:
[http://solarpowerfordomesticuse.com]
Not only for saving energy costs but doing there part to save the planet, if you need more information on solar
products and plans to go solar click this link:
[http://solarpowerfordomesticuse.com]
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét